Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching Azmat Khan: The Impact of the Pulitzer-Winning Airstrikes Series. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Global Investigative Journalism Network at 2022-05-30T00:51:02-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | Azmat Khan: The Impact of the Pulitzer-Winning Airstrikes Series |
| Video Uploader | Video From Global Investigative Journalism Network |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 30-05-2022 07:51:02 |
| Video Discription | On March 18, 2019, a US fighter jet seeking ISIS terrorist targets dropped a bomb on a large crowd of women, men, and children near the town of Baghuz, Syria – and another coalition aircraft then dropped two more bombs on the survivors. Far away, at a US military air operations center in Qatar, one “confused analyst” monitoring drone surveillance typed “Who dropped that?” into the secure messaging system, according to The New York Times. The paper reported that about 70 people, including dozens of civilians, were likely killed in that single, catastrophic blunder. These were just two of more than 1,300 incidents of alleged civilian casualties examined by a team at the Times in an exposé on the US-led coalition air war against ISIS in the Middle East since 2014. Based on its exhaustive analysis, the Times concluded that “the American air war has been plagued by deeply flawed intelligence, rushed and imprecise targeting, and the deaths of thousands of civilians.” The Times revealed two mutually-reinforcing errors among many strike planners. The first was confirmation bias, in which everyday objects and activities were often misinterpreted as the kinds of weapons or suspicious movements that preoccupied strike officers. The second was contextual ignorance, where flawed “patterns of life” theories were used to predict civilian movements, and little attention paid to behavior tied to predictable events like Ramadan, midday heat, and civilians ordered to move by ISIS fighters. Hear reporter Azmat Khan discuss how these biases affected US airstrike targeting in this short video. ----------------------- The Global Investigative Journalism Network is an international association of journalism organizations that support the training and sharing of information among investigative and data journalists—with special attention to those from repressive regimes and marginalized communities. Our key activities include: Providing resources and networking services to investigative journalists worldwide; Publishing in multiple languages and on multiple platforms the latest tools, techniques and opportunities for those in the field; Helping organize and promote regional and international training conferences and workshops; Assisting in the formation and sustainability of journalism organizations involved in investigative reporting and data journalism around the world; Supporting and promoting best practices in investigative and data journalism; Supporting and promoting efforts to ensure free access to public documents and data worldwide. Find more information on our website: https://gijn.org |
| Category | News & Politics |
| Tags | global | investigative | journalism | network | corruption | transparency | Investigate | Investigative | Journalism | Investigative Journalism | GIJN | Global Investigative Journalism Network | Data Journalism | investigative journalist | mobile journalism | investigative news | investigative reporting | how to investigative journalism | what is investigative journalism | free investigative journalism workshops | learn Investigative Journalism | azmat khan | new york times | isis | us military | drone strikes |
