Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 801(d)(1)(A) - prior inconsistent statements. and this vIdeo is uploaded by wporterable at 2020-09-26T22:57:24-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 801(d)(1)(A) - prior inconsistent statements |
| Video Uploader | Video From wporterable |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 27-09-2020 05:57:24 |
| Video Discription | WELCOME to my “Federal Rules of Evidence” program for students interested in the evidentiary rules that govern trials in federal court. "Federal Rules of Evidence" is a series of 12 playlists (with many videos) designed to introduce viewers to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), as well as evidentiary concepts and arguments under the FRE. The 12 playlist topics are set out below in this description. This playlist covers FRE Rules in Article VIII (Hearsay definition and exemptions). This video covers NOT hearsay defined - prior inconsistent statements under Rule 801(d)(1)(A) - and this playlist (organized by FRE rule/concept) features the following videos: Article VIII. Hearsay generally - policy Article VIII. Hearsay generally – witness quoting others Rule 801(a)-(c). [Hearsay] Definitions: [no FRE] Not for “truth of the matter asserted” - Top 5 definitional arguments Article VII. Objection, hearsay – Does the question call for hearsay? Rule 801(d). Exclusions from hearsay – generally Rule 801(d)(1)(A). Prior inconsistent statements – admissible for the truth Rule 801(d)(1)(B). Prior Consistent Statements [after recent charge of fabrication] Rule 801(d)(2)(A). Statements by Party Opponents Rule 801(d)(2)(B-D). Statements Attributed to Party Opponents – adopted, authorized, agent Rule 801(d)(2)(E). Statements Attributed to Party Opponents – Conspirators The channel features several videos within each of these 12 playlists: Intro to FRE Rules & Concepts **(start here)** Articles I & II - General & Judicial Notice. Article IV – Relevance & 403 Article IV – Policy rules Article IV – Character evidence Article V – Privileges Article IV – Witnesses Article IV – Impeachment Article VII – Opinion testimony Article VIII – Hearsay – definition/exemptions Article VIII – Hearsay – exceptions Articles IX & X – Authentication & Original doc ABOUT ME: Professor Wes Porter served as a trial attorney with the Department of Justice's Criminal Division, Fraud Section, in Washington D.C., the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Hawaii and the JAG Corps for the U.S. Navy stationed in the Trial Service Office Pacific. After lecturing and teaching as an adjunct professor for years, he moved to academia full-time teaching courses in Evidence, Criminal Law and Procedure, and skills courses like Trial Advocacy. Professor Porter earned tenure, became a full professor of law, and led a center devoted to evidence, litigation and trial skills training. Professor Porter still teaches in law schools and trains lawyers new to the profession. To contact Professor Porter with questions or video topic requests, you may email him at wesreberporter@gmail.com. ©Wes R. Porter 2020. All rights reserved. |
| Category | Howto & Style |
| Tags | trial | evidence | federal rules of evidence | objection | overruled | sustained | admitted | excluded | motion in limine | evidetiary | argument | law | legal | law school | trial advocacy | advocacy | trailad | mock | mock trial | witness | relevance | hearsay | character evidence | impeachment | direct | cross | opening | closing | redirect | sidebar | plaintiff | defendant | prosecutor | defense attorney | criminal law | modes of impeachment |
