Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Quimbee at 2021-07-15T06:00:09-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained |
| Video Uploader | Video From Quimbee |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 15-07-2021 13:00:09 |
| Video Discription | Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor | 1 W.L.R. 965 (1956) Hearsay is excluded from evidence because it’s considered unreliable. But to count as hearsay, a statement must be offered to prove the truth of its contents. If an out-of-court statement is offered for a different reason, it might not be hearsay at all, as the court explains in Subramaniam versus Public Prosecutor. In April of 1956, four members of the security forces of the Federation of Malaya went to search a terrorist camp in Johore state. They found the camp empty, but in searching the surrounding area they discovered Subramaniam, who was wounded. Subramaniam didn’t have a weapon, but he was wearing an ammunition belt that contained twenty rounds. Subramaniam was arrested and charged with carrying ammunition, which at the time was a crime punishable by death. He pleaded duress as a defense, maintaining that he’d been captured by terrorists, who forced him to carry the ammunition. The trial court, the High Court of Johore Bahru, refused to allow Subramaniam to testify about what the terrorists told him, excluding evidence of conversations between Subramaniam and the terrorists as hearsay. At the close of the trial, the trial court concluded that there was no evidence that Subramaniam had been acting under duress and convicted him. The Supreme Court of the Federation of Malaya dismissed Subramaniam’s appeal. Subramaniam appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/subramaniam-v-public-prosecutor The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/subramaniam-v-public-prosecutor Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/ Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor | briefs | quimbee | law case | case brief example | brief case | case brief | press brief | case summaries | legal brief | how to brief a case | case brief template | legal brief case | how to write a case brief | legal brief example | sample case brief | case brief format | example of a brief | law briefs | legal brief definition | what is a brief in law | what is a case brief | court brief | brief definition law | legal brief template | facts of the case |
