Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching How Trinitarianism Was Made – Second Serve to StirAndFry. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Mr Bear at 2021-09-13T17:00:13-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | How Trinitarianism Was Made – Second Serve to StirAndFry |
| Video Uploader | Video From Mr Bear |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 14-09-2021 00:00:13 |
| Video Discription | A response to Stir and Fry’s response to me! Let the YouTube Ping Pong match continue! _______________________________________________________________________ Original video: Atheist YouTuber Mr Bear Answers My Questions - https://youtu.be/y8IX7gofXew Background: https://pixabay.com/videos/gradient-light-template-bokeh-64342/ Other videos: Piraha - https://youtu.be/MBgzNT8mngw CAPPADOCIAN FATHERS BY MORWENNA LUDLOW - https://youtu.be/yuL9WLu-dC8 West Side Story 1961 The Knife Fight Scene HD - https://youtu.be/CLnT8k4O84M Tag Team Moves & Combos Vol. 2 - https://youtu.be/rpaEBdMnBiw Jesus vs Moses | Fight of Gods Gameplay - https://youtu.be/1YVjvKOSKUA Over 300 Fulfilled Prophecies! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rryQ5YnrNgI _______________________________________________________________________ SUPPORT | TWEET | SNAIL EMAIL 🐻Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/mrbearatheist 🐻Twitter - https://twitter.com/MrBearAtheist 🐻Email – mrbear@atheist.com Thank you so much for your continued support on the interwebs! As defined in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (as amended) Division 3 Section 41A states: “A fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or with an adaptation of a literary, dramatic or musical work, does not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the work if it is for the purpose of parody or satire.” Copyright material can be used for the purposes of parody and satire without permission, provided your use is fair. The terms “parody” and “satire” are not defined in the Copyright Act and have not yet been considered by Australian courts, but it is likely that a court would look at dictionary definitions of the words to decide what they mean in the context of the Act. People can use copyright material for the purpose of criticism or review without infringing copyright, provided they acknowledge the author and title of the work, and provided the dealing is “fair”. |
| Category | Entertainment |
| Tags | atheism | atheist | atheists | religion | MrBear | Mr Bear | MrBearAtheist | mr bear atheist | mrbearatheist | debunked | christianity debunked | response video | stirandfry | apologetics debunked | christian apologetics | secularism | funny |
