Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching Let's Talk About Singular They.. and this vIdeo is uploaded by K Klein at 2022-10-14T10:09:25-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | Let's Talk About Singular They. |
| Video Uploader | Video From K Klein |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 14-10-2022 17:09:25 |
| Video Discription | A sequel to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQNdkdqoIdw Thanks to my patrons!! Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=73482298 Special thanks to Calvin for pestering me until I made this video. Sources: Baron, D. (1981-2015). The Words that Failed: A chronology of early nonbinary pronouns. Baron, D. (1986). Grammar and Gender. New Haven. Baron, D. (2018). A brief history of singular ‘they’. Oxford English Dictionary Blogs. Fisher, A. (1745). A New Grammar [2nd ed. 1750]. Newcastle upon Tyne. Gerner, J. (1998). Singular and Plural Anaphors of Indefinite Personal Pronouns in Spoken British English. Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English: Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora. Graham, S. (2001). Sulawesi's fifth gender. Inside Indonesia. McWhorter, J. (2013). The Royal They: Fighting against the tyranny of pronouns. The New Republic. LaScotte, D. (2016). Singular they: An Empirical Study of Generic Pronoun Use. American Speech. 91 (1): 62–80. Miller, C. & Swift, K. (1980). The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing. New York. Harper & Row. Safire, W. (1985). On Language; You Not Tarzan, Me Not Jane. The New York Times. Wagner, S. (2003). Gender in English Pronouns: Myth and Reality. University of Freiburg. (1881). Detroit Free Press. May 13 edition. (2018). Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. (2022). they. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Constitution of the United States of America. Article 1 §2. Literary examples of the singular “they”: Austen, Jane. (1814). Mansfield Park. Shakespeare, William. (p. 1623). The Comedy of Errors. Shaw, George Bernard. (1898). Plays Pleasant and Unpleasant. Anonymous writer. (c.1350). William and the Werewolf. Translated c. 1350-1375 to English from the original French written c. 1200. NOTES FROM VIDEO: [Note 1] When I say “is from”, I am arguing purely from a synchronic perspective – I mean it as a shorthand for the fact that the plural mixed gender and plural masculine are the same, and distinct from the plural feminine in French. I am not making an argument from etymology here. [Note 2] Wagner argues that “the choice of a supposedly masculine personal pronoun (him) said nothing about the gender or sex of the referent” in Middle English. However, I would argue that the association with the masculine over the feminine still applies. Wagner herself writes that this pronoun can be used for any combination of the genders “masculine” and “neuter”, or sexes “male” and “asexual”, deliberately excluding the “feminine” or “female”. Despite being gender-neutral in some contexts, this pronoun was never epicene, not even in Middle English. [Note 3] Note, of course, that “man” was originally the word for “human”, and only later came to mean “male adult”. In Old English, “man” was “wer”, and “woman” was “wif”. [Note 4] Joke. [Note 5] Note the significantly lower percentages found only three years earlier, in Erdmann (1995), with singular “they” only being used in just under 50% of cases. This study was, firstly, done on Americans, who may be more biased against the singular “they”, and was also a study of written language, reflecting how the singular “they” is often seen as too informal by publishers, and therefore either avoided by authors, or changed by the editors. [Note 6] Actually, in the examples given from Shakespeare’s Comedy of Errors and Austen’s Mansfield Park, the gender of the referent is known (masculine in the former case, feminine in the latter), but an epicene pronoun is used regardless. Go figure. [Note 7] I am aware that people have been identifying as non-binary for a long time, even in Europe and colonial America. The sociology and history of this is worth looking into, but I am personally less interested in it and therefore didn’t want to go into the topic in the video. [Note 8] When it is a subject, this “sie/Sie” can be separated out into “she/feminine it” with the 3rd person singular verb ending, and “they/you” with the 3rd person plural verb ending. In the dative, the same split accords, as the former take the dative “ihr” and the latter the dative “ihnen/Ihnen”. When in the accusative or genitive, there is no difference in spoken language between the four. However, in writing, the formal “you” is distinguished from the others because it, and all its forms, are capitalised. Chapters: 0:00 – The Epicene “They” 2:48 – The Generic “He” 5:28 – The Non-Binary “They” 7:21 – Credits Written and Created by me Art by kvd102 Music by me Translations: Ferr - Indonesian D'ignoranza & Marco Lisoni - Italian Leeuwe van den Heuvel - Dutch Gergő Kulman - Hungarian Ray Karr - Spanish Ollie - French 千雨 Chisame - Standard Mandarin, Japanese Risto Kynkäänniemi - Finnish Jafar - Arabic Natália - Portuguese Álftanes - Cantonese Maymun - Turkish Eneko Andonegi - Basque Kantoros1 - Czech Mihaela Modic - Slovene defr - Korean #theythem #nonbinary #pronouns |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | non-binary | enby issues | they/them | pronouns | history of they/them | english | language | french | german | arabic | generic he | singular they | non-binary pronouns | linguistics | language history | vikings | old norse | old english | middle english | william and the werewolf | nb | they | them | prescriptivism | english history | epicene | epicenity | what is epicenity | a new grammar | ann fisher | shakespeare | themself | austen | shaw | sexism in language | nonsexist writing | belva lockwood | jeannette rankin | US history |
