Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching New York Times Co. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Quimbee at 2020-11-04T12:15:02-08:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | New York Times Co. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained |
| Video Uploader | Video From Quimbee |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 04-11-2020 20:15:02 |
| Video Discription | Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview New York Times Co. v. United States | 403 U.S. 713 (1971) There are virtually no constitutional absolutes. But the First Amendment’s prohibition against prior restraints of the press comes close to being one. Are prior restraints ever permissible? The splintered United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in New York Times versus United States. Daniel Ellsberg helped author a top-secret government study, informally called the Pentagon Papers, that contained embarrassing information about the government’s involvement in the ongoing Vietnam War. In 1971, he leaked portions of the report to the New York Times and Washington Post. After the newspapers published articles based on the leaked portions and indicated more articles were forthcoming, the Justice Department filed lawsuits in federal district courts in New York and Washington, D.C., seeking injunctions against publication of further articles based on certain portions of the leaked material. The government offered no proof that future articles would cause a break in diplomatic relations with any country or a new military conflict or would compromise military or intelligence operations. Rather, the government merely tried to prove that the articles would interfere with the State Department’s negotiations concerning the war’s end and generally embarrass its diplomatic efforts. The two district courts denied preliminary injunctions, and the government appealed. The D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court’s order, but the Second Circuit entered a temporary restraining order and remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The New York Times successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the case before judgment in the Second Circuit, while the United States successfully petitioned the Court to review the D.C. Circuit’s judgment. The Supreme Court consolidated the cases. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-united-states The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-united-states Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/ Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | New York Times Co. v. U.S. | briefs | quimbee | law case | case brief example | brief case | case brief | press brief | case summaries | legal brief | how to brief a case | case brief template | legal brief case | how to write a case brief | legal brief example | sample case brief | case brief format | example of a brief | law briefs | legal brief definition | what is a brief in law | what is a case brief | court brief | brief definition law | legal brief template | facts of the case | case law |
