Hellow guys, Welcome to my website, and you are watching United States v. Jones Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. and this vIdeo is uploaded by Quimbee at 2020-10-06T05:00:01-07:00. We are pramote this video only for entertainment and educational perpose only. So, I hop you like our website.
| Name | United States v. Jones Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained |
| Video Uploader | Video From Quimbee |
| Upload Date | This Video Uploaded At 06-10-2020 12:00:01 |
| Video Discription | Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview United States v. Jones | 565 U.S. 400 (2012) Imagine that police officers placed a Global Positioning System, or GPS, tracking device on your car, and then monitored your every movement for a month. In United States versus Jones, the Supreme Court addressed whether the Fourth Amendment requires a search warrant to do so. In 2004, officers in the District of Columbia suspected that a club owner named Antoine Jones was involved in a drug-trafficking conspiracy. Without a valid warrant, the officers placed a small GPS tracking device, weighing only two ounces and about the size of a credit card, on the undercarriage of his car. The officers then tracked the car’s movements, including its trip to a stash house used by drug dealers. Federal prosecutors used the GPS tracking records, along with other evidence, to obtain an indictment alleging that Jones was part of a drug conspiracy. Jones filed a pretrial motion to suppress the GPS records, contending that the officers’ placement of the GPS device and their monitoring of his car’s movements violated the Fourth Amendment. The federal district court denied the motion in part, ruling that officers’ GPS monitoring of Jones’s car on public roads wasn’t a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. A jury then convicted Jones, and he was sentenced to life in prison. Jones appealed to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which reversed the conviction. The court concluded that the GPS monitoring violated Jones’s reasonable expectation of privacy and, therefore, violated the Fourth Amendment. The United States then sought review by the United States Supreme Court. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-jones--2 The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-jones--2 Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/ Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries |
| Category | Education |
| Tags | U.S. v. Jones | briefs | quimbee | law case | case brief example | brief case | case brief | press brief | case summaries | legal brief | how to brief a case | case brief template | legal brief case | how to write a case brief | legal brief example | sample case brief | case brief format | example of a brief | law briefs | legal brief definition | what is a brief in law | what is a case brief | court brief | brief definition law | legal brief template | facts of the case | case summary example |
